The 1991 figures confirm clearly that a trend has built since 1986, when
the capital-gains rate was raised to 28% from 20%.
...
From 1988 through 1991, inflation-adjusted taxable capital gains plummeted,
remaining below the 1985 level every single year. In fact, inflation-adjusted
taxable capital gains in 1991 were half what they were in 1985 and lower than
they have been in any year since 1978.
The drop-off has been so dramatic that in 1991 the federal government took
in 21% less revenue at 28% than it did in 1985 at the 20% rate.
...
A soon to be released study by the Republican members of the Joint
Economic Committee yields this interesting scenario:
Had capital gains rate remained at 20%, and had capital gains continued
their 12% rate of growth from 1980 to 1985, the government would have
netted $60 billion more in capital gains revenues in the years 1986-91.
...
Invariably since the late 1960's every time capital gains tax rates have
risen, capital gains realizations have fallen; every time the rates have
been cut, realizations have accelerated because of an unlocking affect.
...
The JCT (Joint Committee on Taxation) argued in a highly publicized
1989 study that 60% of the benefits of a capital gains tax cut would accrue
Americans making more than $200,000 a year. This mantra of a "tax cut for
the rich" was predicated on forecasts that taxable capital gains would
accelerate even after rates were raised.
These predictions were spectacularly wrong. In Jan. 1990 the CBO
(congressional budget office) extimated that taxable capital gains would be
$269 billion in 1991; in 1987, JCT projected that they would be $285 billion
in 1991. In reality, taxable capital gains totaled $108 billion.
...
A report by the Texas based Institute for Policy Innovation released in Feb.
calculates that indexing capital gains to inflation would add $511 billion to
gross domestic product by 1997, create 550,000 jobs and raise $111 billion
in capital gains and other federal tax revenues as a result of the
enhanced economic growth.
[Source: Monday April 5, 1993, editorial page.]