There are three men here tonight I am very proud to introduce. It was a year
ago this coming February when this country had its spirits lifted as they have
never been lifted in many years. This happened when planes began landing on
American soil and in the Philippines, bringing back men who had lived with
honor for many miserable years in North Vietnam prisons. Three of those men
are here tonight, John McCain, Bill Lawrence and Ed Martin. It is an honor to
be here tonight. I am proud that you asked me and I feel more than a little
humble in the presence of this distinguished company.
There are men here tonight who, through their wisdom, their foresight and
their courage, have earned the right to be regarded as prophets of our
philosophy. Indeed they are prophets of our times. In years past when others
were silent or too blind to the facts, they spoke up forcefully and fearlessly for
what they believed to be right. A decade has passed since Barry
Goldwater
walked a lonely path across this land reminding us that even a land as rich as
ours can't go on forever borrowing against the future, leaving a legacy of debt
for another generation and causing a runaway inflation to erode the savings
and reduce the standard of living. Voices have been raised trying to rekindle
in our country all of the great ideas and principles which set this nation apart
from all the others that preceded it, but louder and more strident voices utter
easily sold cliches.
Cartoonists with acid-tipped pens portray some of the reminders of our
heritage and our destiny as old-fashioned. They say that we are trying to
retreat into a past that actually never existed. Looking to the past in an effort
to keep our country from repeating the errors of history is termed by them as
“taking the country back to McKinley.” Of course I never found that was so
bad—under McKinley we freed Cuba. On the span of history, we are still
thought of as a young upstart country celebrating soon only our second
century as a nation, and yet we are the oldest continuing republic in the world.
I thought that tonight, rather than talking on the subjects you are discussing, or
trying to find something new to say, it might be appropriate to reflect a bit on
our heritage.
You can call it mysticism if you want to, but I have always believed that there
was some divine plan that placed this great continent between two oceans to
be sought out by those who were possessed of an abiding love of freedom
and a special kind of courage.
This was true of those who pioneered the great wilderness in the beginning of
this country, as it is also true of those later immigrants who were willing to
leave the land of their birth and come to a land where even the language was
unknown to them. Call it chauvinistic, but our heritage does not set us apart.
Some years ago a writer, who happened to be an avid student of history, told
me a story about that day in the little hall in Philadelphia where honorable
men, hard-pressed by a King who was flouting the very law they were willing
to obey, debated whether they should take the fateful step of declaring their
independence from that king. I was told by this man that the story could be
found in the writings of Jefferson. I confess, I never researched or made an
effort to verify it. Perhaps it is only legend. But story, or legend, he described
the atmosphere, the strain, the debate, and that as men for the first time faced
the consequences of such an irretrievable act, the walls resounded with the
dread word of treason and its price—the gallows and the headman's axe. As
the day wore on the issue hung in the balance, and then, according to the
story, a man rose in the small gallery. He was not a young man and was
obviously calling on all the energy he could muster. Citing the grievances that
had brought them to this moment he said, “Sign that parchment. They may
turn every tree into a gallows, every home into a grave and yet the words of
that parchment can never die. For the mechanic in his workshop, they will be
words of hope, to the slave in the mines—freedom.” And he added, “If my
hands were freezing in death, I would sign that parchment with my last ounce
of strength. Sign, sign if the next moment the noose is around your neck, sign
even if the hall is ringing with the sound of headman’s axe, for that parchment
will be the textbook of freedom, the bible of the rights of man forever.” And
then it is said he fell back exhausted. But 56 delegates, swept by his
eloquence, signed the Declaration of Independence, a document destined to
be as immortal as any work of man can be. And according to the story, when
they turned to thank him for his timely oratory, he could not be found nor
were there any who knew who he was or how he had come in or gone out
through the locked and guarded doors.
Well, as I say, whether story or legend, the signing of the document that day
in Independence Hall was miracle enough. Fifty-six men, a little band so
unique—we have never seen their like since—pledged their lives, their
fortunes and their sacred honor. Sixteen gave their lives, most gave their
fortunes and all of them preserved their sacred honor. What manner of men
were they? Certainly they were not an unwashed, revolutionary rebel, nor
were then adventurers in a heroic mood. Twenty-four were lawyers and
jurists, 11 were merchants and tradesmen, nine were farmers. They were men
who would achieve security but valued freedom more.
And what price did they pay? John Hart was driven from the side of his
desperately ill wife. After more than a year of living almost as an animal in the
forest and in caves, he returned to find his wife had died and his children had
vanished. He never saw them again, his property was destroyed and he died
of a broken heart—but with no regret, only pride in the part he had played
that day in Independence Hall. Carter Braxton of Virginia lost all his ships—they were sold to pay his debts. He died in rags. So it was with Ellery,
Clymer, Hall, Walton, Gwinnett, Rutledge, Morris, Livingston, and
Middleton. Nelson, learning that Cornwallis was using his home for a
headquarters, personally begged Washington to fire on him and destroy his
home--he died bankrupt. It has never been reported that any of these men
ever expressed bitterness or renounced their action as not worth the price.
Fifty-six rank-and-file, ordinary citizens had founded a nation that grew from
sea to shining sea, five million farms, quiet villages, cities that never sleep—all
done without an area re-development plan, urban renewal or a rural legal
assistance program.
Now we are a nation of 211 million people with a pedigree that includes
blood lines from every corner of the world. We have shed that
American-melting-pot blood in every corner of the world, usually in defense
of someone's freedom. Those who remained of that remarkable band we call
our Founding Fathers tied up some of the loose ends about a dozen years
after the Revolution. It had been the first revolution in all man’s history that did
not just exchange one set of rulers for another. This had been a philosophical
revolution. The culmination of men's dreams for 6,000 years were formalized
with the Constitution, probably the most unique document ever drawn in the
long history of man's relation to man. I know there have been other
constitutions, new ones are being drawn today by newly emerging nations.
Most of them, even the one of the Soviet Union, contains many of the same
guarantees as our own Constitution, and still there is a difference. The
difference is so subtle that we often overlook it, but is is so great that it tells
the whole story. Those other constitutions say, “Government grants you these
rights” and ours says, “You are born with these rights, they are yours by the
grace of God, and no government on earth can take them from you.”
Lord Acton of England, who once said, “Power corrupts, and absolute
power corrupts absolutely,” would say of that document, “They had solved
with astonishing ease and unduplicated success two problems which had
heretofore baffled the capacity of the most enlightened nations. They had
contrived a system of federal government which prodigiously increased
national power and yet respected local liberties and authorities, and they had
founded it on a principle of equality without surrendering the securities of
property or freedom.” Never in any society has the preeminence of the
individual been so firmly established and given such a priority.
In less than twenty years we would go to war because the God-given rights of
the American sailors, as defined in the Constitution, were being violated by a
foreign power. We served notice then on the world that all of us together
would act collectively to safeguard the rights of even the least among us. But
still, in an older, cynical world, they were not convinced. The great powers of
Europe still had the idea that one day this great continent would be open again
to colonizing and they would come over and divide us up.
In the meantime, men who yearned to breathe free were making their way to
our shores. Among them was a young refugee from the Austro-Hungarian
Empire. He had been a leader in an attempt to free Hungary from Austrian
rule. The attempt had failed and he fled to escape execution. In America, this
young Hungarian, Koscha by name, became an importer by trade and took
out his first citizenship papers. One day, business took him to a
Mediterranean port. There was a large Austrian warship under the command
of an admiral in the harbor. He had a manservant with him. He had described
to this manservant what the flag of his new country looked like. Word was
passed to the Austrian warship that this revolutionary was there and in the
night he was kidnapped and taken aboard that large ship. This man's servant,
desperate, walking up and down the harbor, suddenly spied a flag that
resembled the description he had heard. It was a small American war sloop.
He went aboard and told Captain Ingraham, of that war sloop, his story.
Captain Ingraham went to the American Consul. When the American Consul
learned that Koscha had only taken out his first citizenship papers, the consul
washed his hands of the incident. Captain Ingraham said, “I am the senior
officer in this port and I believe, under my oath of my office, that I owe this
man the protection of our flag.”
He went aboard the Austrian warship and demanded to see their prisoner,
our citizen. The Admiral was amused, but they brought the man on deck. He
was in chains and had been badly beaten. Captain Ingraham said, “I can hear
him better without those chains,” and the chains were removed. He walked
over and said to Kocha, “I will ask you one question; consider your answer
carefully. Do you ask the protection of the American flag?” Kocha nodded
dumbly “Yes,” and the Captain said, “You shall have it.” He went back and
told the frightened consul what he had done. Later in the day three more
Austrian ships sailed into harbor. It looked as though the four were getting
ready to leave. Captain Ingraham sent a junior officer over to the Austrian flag
ship to tell the Admiral that any attempt to leave that harbor with our citizen
aboard would be resisted with appropriate force. He said that he would
expect a satisfactory answer by four o'clock that afternoon. As the hour
neared they looked at each other through the glasses. As it struck four he had
them roll the cannons into the ports and had then light the tapers with which
they would set off the cannons—one little sloop. Suddenly the lookout tower
called out and said, “They are lowering a boat,” and they rowed Koscha over
to the little American ship.
Captain Ingraham then went below and wrote his letter of resignation to the
United States Navy. In it he said, “I did what I thought my oath of office
required, but if I have embarrassed my country in any way, I resign.” His
resignation was refused in the United States Senate with these words: “This
battle that was never fought may turn out to be the most important battle in
our Nation's history.” Incidentally, there is to this day, and I hope there
always will be, a USS Ingraham in the United States Navy.
I did not tell that story out of any desire to be narrowly chauvinistic or to
glorify aggressive militarism, but it is an example of government meeting its
highest responsibility.
In recent years we have been treated to a rash of noble-sounding phrases.
Some of them sound good, but they don't hold up under close analysis. Take
for instance the slogan so frequently uttered by the young senator from
Massachusetts, “The greatest good for the greatest number." Certainly under
that slogan, no modern day Captain Ingraham would risk even the smallest
craft and crew for a single citizen. Every dictator who ever lived has justified
the enslavement of his people on the theory of what was good for the
majority.
We are not a warlike people. Nor is our history filled with tales of aggressive
adventures and imperialism, which might come as a shock to some of the
placard painters in our modern demonstrations. The lesson of Vietnam, I
think, should be that never again will young Americans be asked to fight and
possibly die for a cause unless that cause is so meaningful that we, as a nation,
pledge our full resources to achieve victory as quickly as possible.
I realize that such a pronouncement, of course, would possibly be laying one
open to the charge of warmongering—but that would also be ridiculous. My
generation has paid a higher price and has fought harder for freedom that any
generation that had ever lived. We have known four wars in a single lifetime.
All were horrible, all could have been avoided if at a particular moment in time
we had made it plain that we subscribed to the words of John Stuart Mill
when he said that “war is an ugly thing, but not the ugliest of things.”
The decayed and degraded state of moral and patriotic feeling which thinks
nothing is worth a war is worse. The man who has nothing which he cares
about more than his personal safety is a miserable creature and has no chance
of being free unless made and kept so by the exertions of better men than
himself.
The widespread disaffection with things military is only a part of the
philosophical division in our land today. I must say to you who have recently,
or presently are still receiving an education, I am awed by your powers of
resistance. I have some knowledge of the attempts that have been made in
many classrooms and lecture halls to persuade you that there is little to admire
in America. For the second time in this century, capitalism and the free
enterprise are under assault. Privately owned business is blamed for spoiling
the environment, exploiting the worker and seducing, if not outright raping, the
customer. Those who make the charge have the solution, of course—government regulation and control. We may never get around to explaining
how citizens who are so gullible that they can be suckered into buying cereal
or soap that they don't need and would not be good for them, can at the same
time be astute enough to choose representatives in government to which they
would entrust the running of their lives.
Not too long ago, a poll was taken on 2,500 college campuses in this country.
Thousands and thousands of responses were obtained. Overwhelmingly, 65,
70, and 75 percent of the students found business responsible, as I have said
before, for the things that were wrong in this country. That same number said
that government was the solution and should take over the management and
the control of private business. Eighty percent of the respondents said they
wanted government to keep its paws out of their private lives.
We are told every day that the assembly-line worker is becoming a
dull-witted robot and that mass production results in standardization. Well,
there isn't a socialist country in the world that would not give its copy of Karl
Marx for our standardization.
Standardization means production for the masses and the assembly line means
more leisure for the worker—freedom from backbreaking and mind-dulling
drudgery that man had known for centuries past. Karl Marx did not abolish
child labor or free the women from working in the coal mines in England the
steam engine and modern machinery did that.
Unfortunately, the disciples of the new order have had a hand in determining
too much policy in recent decades. Government has grown in size and power
and cost through the New Deal, the Fair Deal, the New Frontier and the
Great Society. It costs more for government today than a family pays for
food, shelter and clothing combined. Not even the Office of Management and
Budget knows how many boards, commissions, bureaus and agencies there
are in the federal government, but the federal registry, listing their regulations,
is just a few pages short of being as big as the Encyclopedia Britannica.
During the Great Society we saw the greatest growth of this government.
There were eight cabinet departments and 12 independent agencies to
administer the federal health program. There were 35 housing programs and
20 transportation projects. Public utilities had to cope with 27 different
agencies on just routine business. There were 192 installations and nine
departments with 1,000 projects having to do with the field of pollution.
One Congressman found the federal government was spending 4 billion
dollars on research in its own laboratories but did not know where they were,
how many people were working in them, or what they were doing. One of the
research projects was “The Demography of Happiness,” and for 249,000
dollars we found that “people who make more money are happier than
people who make less, young people are happier than old people, and people
who are healthier are happier than people who are sick.” For 15 cents they
could have bought an Almanac and read the old bromide, “It's better to be
rich, young and healthy, than poor, old and sick.”
The course that you have chosen is far more in tune with the hopes and
aspirations of our people than are those who would sacrifice freedom for
some fancied security.
Standing on the tiny deck of the Arabella in 1630 off the Massachusetts
coast, John Winthrop said, “We will be as a city upon a hill. The eyes of all
people are upon us, so that if we deal falsely with our God in this work we
have undertaken and so cause Him to withdraw His present help from us, we
shall be made a story and a byword throughout the world.” Well, we have not
dealt falsely with our God, even if He is temporarily suspended from the
classroom.
When I was born my life expectancy was 10 years less than I have already
lived—that’s a cause of regret for some people in California, I know. Ninety
percent of Americans at that time lived beneath what is considered the
poverty line today, three-quarters lived in what is considered substandard
housing. Today each of those figures is less than 10 percent. We have
increased our life expectancy by wiping out, almost totally, diseases that still
ravage mankind in other parts of the world. I doubt if the young people here
tonight know the names of some of the diseases that were commonplace
when we were growing up. We have more doctors per thousand people than
any nation in the world. We have more hospitals that any nation in the world.
When I was your age, believe it or not, none of us knew that we even had a
racial problem. When I graduated from college and became a radio sport
announcer, broadcasting major league baseball, I didn’t have a Hank Aaron
or a Willie Mays to talk about. The Spaulding Guide said baseball was a
game for Caucasian gentlemen. Some of us then began editorializing and
campaigning against this. Gradually we campaigned against all those other
areas where the constitutional rights of a large segment of our citizenry were
being denied. We have not finished the job. We still have a long way to go,
but we have made more progress in a few years than we have made in more
than a century.
One-third of all the students in the world who are pursuing higher education
are doing so in the United States. The percentage of our young Negro
community that is going to college is greater than the percentage of whites in
any other country in the world.
One-half of all the economic activity in the entire history of man has taken
place in this republic. We have distributed our wealth more widely among our
people than any society known to man. Americans work less hours for a
higher standard of living than any other people. Ninety-five percent of all our
families have an adequate daily intake of nutrients—and a part of the five
percent that don't are trying to lose weight! Ninety-nine percent have gas or
electric refrigeration, 92 percent have televisions, and an equal number have
telephones. There are 120 million cars on our streets and highways—and all
of them are on the street at once when you are trying to get home at night. But
isn't this just proof of our materialism—the very thing that we are charged
with? Well, we also have more churches, more libraries, we support
voluntarily more symphony orchestras, and opera companies, non-profit
theaters, and publish more books than all the other nations of the world put
together.
Somehow America has bred a kindliness into our people unmatched
anywhere, as has been pointed out in that best-selling record by a Canadian
journalist. We are not a sick society. A sick society could not produce the
men that set foot on the moon, or who are now circling the earth above us in
the Skylab. A sick society bereft of morality and courage did not produce the
men who went through those year of torture and captivity in Vietnam. Where
did we find such men? They are typical of this land as the Founding Fathers
were typical. We found them in our streets, in the offices, the shops and the
working places of our country and on the farms.
We cannot escape our destiny, nor should we try to do so. The leadership of
the free world was thrust upon us two centuries ago in that little hall of
Philadelphia. In the days following World War II, when the economic strength
and power of America was all that stood between the world and the return to
the dark ages, Pope Pius XII said, “The American people have a great genius
for splendid and unselfish actions. Into the hands of America God has placed
the destinies of an afflicted mankind.”
We are indeed, and we are today, the last best hope of man on earth.