|
One of the dangers of a second term for U.S. Presidents is the tendency to surround
yourself with "yes" men and women. Groupthink is a dangerous trap for any organization
to fall into, and someone questioning premises is a good thing.
Another danger is replacing trusted people whom you have known for years with talented,
but relatively unknown people. President Reagan suffered from the lack of personal
knowledge about many people in his second term administration. Gone were the trusted
friends whom he had known for decades and in their place were talented people, but
some of them did not understand the nuances of "what Reagan wants". Iran-Contra happened
in part because Reagan was used to people understanding what he meant when he asked
"is it legal" when he was dealing with people who assumed that he meant
"tell me its legal, no matter what". The assumptions that ran up and down the chain of
command were also a factor in that scandal. People at the bottom of the food chain were
under the impression that their orders came straight from the top while Reagan trusted
people close to him to operate within the boundaries of existing law.
President Bush needs to guard against both of these problems. There are a lot of people
who have supported the President who expect that support to be "cashed in" with appointments.
These people will have little personal loyalty to the President. Another group of people
seeking appointments are the "understudies" who have performed at just below cabinet status.
They are likely to say what they think the President wants to hear in order to gain higher office.
President Bush should get opinions from all across the political spectrum and both inside
and outside of traditional Washington power centers to find the best people for the jobs.
The President's willingness to reach across the political aisle for help will benefit him,
as will his ability to bring political opponents onto his team.
Ability should be the main criteria going forward, not political loyalty or past favors.
It will mean the difference between an outstanding second term and a lackluster and/or scandal-ridden second term.
|
|
Groupthink is a dangerous trap for any organization to fall into, and someone questioning premises is a good thing.
President Reagan suffered from the lack of personal knowledge about many people in his second term administration
There are a lot of people who have supported the President who expect that support to be "cashed in" with appointments.
Ability should be the main criteria going forward, not political loyalty or past favors.
Discuss this article in the Reality Hammer blog.
|